Bên cạnh PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI THẬT TASK 2 (dạng advantages & disadvantages) Some students work while studying. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend and give your opinion?NGÀY 04/8/2020 IELTS WRITING GENERAL MÁY TÍNH (kèm bài được sửa hs đi thi), IELTS TUTOR cũng cung cấp Sweet Trouble: Đề thi thật IELTS READING (IELTS Reading Recent Actual Test)
I. Kiến thức liên quan
II. Làm bài online
III. Sweet Trouble: Đề thi thật IELTS READING (IELTS Reading Recent Actual Test)
READING PASSAGE 1
Sweet Trouble
Problems in the Australian sugar industry
The Australian town of Mossman in the state of Queensland sits in a tropical landscape between the rainforest and the Great Barrier Reef. Eco-tourism is important there; more than 80% of Douglas Shire, of which Mossman is the administrative centre, is protected by World Heritage listing. But for most of the town’s history, forest and reef have been largely irrelevant: since the sugar mill was built in 1894, the town has relied on sugarcane. Now Mossman is holding its breath. For two years the mill used by all the farms has been close to bankruptcy. It is at the centre of the economic shocks that have shaken Australia’s sugar industry, and for lifetime farmers and a long list of cane industry workers a way of life will disappear if the mill closes. Mossman has roughly 160 growers, who now produce less than one million of the nation’s annual cane harvest of 30–40 million tonnes. But it is a microcosm of the industry. All across Australia, the cane-growing business is being squeezed between the pincers of economics and the environment.
The ten-year average return to sugar growers throughout the 1990s was about $350 a tonne. In early 2004, sugar prices plummeted, resulting in a 25-year-low average of around $232 a tonne. Although figures vary widely across farms and regions, that was about what it cost to grow a tonne of sugar in Australia. To forestall social and economic disaster, the Government offered more than $400 million to encourage growers to leave the industry. By the end of the year, 274 farmers had taken up the offer to leave, but another 1,000 are thought to be seriously considering it, allowing those remaining to buy the vacated land and improve their economies of scale.
Fourth-generation Mossman grower Bill Phillips-Turner is one who plans to fight on. ‘The consequences of losing the mill would be catastrophic,’ Bill says. ‘Sugar has a big economic multiplier effect: for every dollar generated from sugar, an additional $7 is generated in the wider community. Because of limited options around here, most people now employed by the industry would have to leave the area to find work.’ The farmer-shareholders have so far saved the mill by accepting substantial cuts to cane payments, but this has come at a big cost to everyone. As chairman of the board of the mill, Bill has presided over tough and unpopular decisions: he has had to sack staff, cut working hours and reduce the workforce. Assets were sold and management was outsourced. They have also worked hard to find new ways of doing business. Ethanol production, using sugar-based fuel, has potential, and co-generation, using cane waste to produce fuel, power, or generate electricity, is another possibility. However, the most preferred alternative is to create a future for the mill as a food factory, turning out quality sugar-based foods.>> Form đăng kí giải đề thi thật IELTS 4 kĩ năng kèm bài giải bộ đề 100 đề PART 2 IELTS SPEAKING quý đang thi (update hàng tuần) từ IELTS TUTOR
In addition to the economic struggle, there is the environmental one. The sugar industry has the reputation of being environmentally damaging, but it has some surprising supporters. Douglas Shire mayor, Mike Berwick, is a well-known environmentalist, and might be expected to be anti-cane. ‘There’s no question of the past damage it’s done to the reef through chemical and nutrient run-off,’ he says. ‘But there’s a formula for sustainable cane production and Mossman has nearly reached it.’ Another surprise endorsement for cane comes from the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency’s sugar liaison officer, Karen Benn. ‘I’m less worried about the effect of cane on the environment than I am about other agriculture,’ she says. ‘There are good growers everywhere, but at Mossman they seem to have taken up the challenges faster.’ For example, sediment run-off, previously one of the main environmental problems caused by cane growing, is now nothing like it once was, according to Dr Brian Roberts, co-ordinator of the Douglas Shire Water Quality Improvement Program. ‘North Queensland used to hold the record for soil loss,’ he says. ‘Now ... cane country is accumulating soil.’
However, these improvements have been achieved at a great cost to growers. Now in his 60s, Tom Watters has spent a lifetime on the same farm. Fourteen years ago, he was alerted to the fact his cane could be having an impact on the waterway on Mackay Creek, the narrow waterway that receives all his run-off, and so Tom planted a 5,000-tree buffer along the edge of the creek with rocks to prevent erosion, and began exploring methods that cause minimal soil disturbance. However, none of these costly initiatives has helped him get better cane prices. As his neighbour, Doug Cress, comments that ‘Economically, the [cane growing] doesn’t make much sense. But there’s more to life than money. It’s this addiction to the way of life that keeps many cane farmers growing an under-performing crop. “It’s a good lifestyle,” Doug says. “I spend eight months working on the farm and four months working with our kids while my wife works in town. I’ve been looking at alternative crops, like forestry and cocoa, and it turns out that working away from the farm is the best diversification we could do. However, I still don’t want to do that.”’
It is difficult to see how anyone can deal satisfactorily with the passing of a way of life. Cane farmers have been part of eastern Queensland for more than a century. But, despite the efforts they have put into fighting the good environmental fight, there is no guarantee that the new way of life evolving there will include cane.
Questions 1–4
Look at the following statements (Questions 1–4) and the list of people below.
Match each statement with the correct person, A–F.
Write the correct letter, A–F, in boxes 1–4 on your answer sheet.
List of people
A. Bill Phillips - Turner B. Mike Berwick C. Karen Bono D. Brian Roberts E. Tom Watters F. Doug Crees
- Mossman cane farming practices are close to an environmentally friendly model.
- Financial return is not the only important factor for cane growers.
- Cane sugar may not harm the environment as much as other crops do.
- The local population would decline if the sugar-processing plant closed.
Questions 5–8
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 5–8 on your answer sheet.
In the first paragraph, the writer says that the town is 'holding its breath' because
A. it has environmental problems.
B. its tourism business is threatened.
C. most of its people have left the town.
D. a key processing plant may shut down.According to the writer, cane growers who refuse the government offer are expected to
A. expand their farms.
B. sell their land at a low price.
C. find jobs in other industries.
D. seek financial help from banks.Which of the following did Bill Phillips-Turner find most difficult to do?
A. sell mill property
B. reduce spending on upkeep
C. lower mill workers’ wages
D. cut the number of mill staffCane grower Doug Cress says that he
A. would prefer to grow cocoa.
B. wants to remain on his farm.
C. wants his family to live together.
D. will look for part-time work in town.
Questions 9–13
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 9–13 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
- In 2004, the cost of producing sugar in Australia was similar to the selling price.
- Farmers who accepted the Government offer have mostly moved to the city.
- Fuel production is regarded as the most desirable alternative business for the sugar mill.
- Tom Watters reduced his use of pesticides.
- Environmentally friendly farming practices have been profitable for Tom Watters.
IV. Giải thích từ vựng Sweet Trouble
1. Environmentally friendly
- Meaning: Thân thiện với môi trường.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Mossman cane farming practices are close to an environmentally friendly model.
- Vietnamese: Các hoạt động canh tác mía của Mossman gần đạt đến mô hình thân thiện với môi trường.
2. Financial return
- Meaning: Lợi nhuận tài chính.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Financial return is not the only important factor for cane growers.
- Vietnamese: Lợi nhuận tài chính không phải là yếu tố quan trọng duy nhất đối với những người trồng mía.
3. Decline
- Meaning: Suy giảm, giảm bớt.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: The local population would decline if the sugar-processing plant closed.
- Vietnamese: Dân số địa phương sẽ giảm nếu nhà máy chế biến đường đóng cửa.
4. Holding its breath
- Meaning: Lo lắng, hồi hộp chờ đợi điều gì sẽ xảy ra.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: In the first paragraph, the writer says that the town is 'holding its breath' because a key processing plant may shut down.
- Vietnamese: Trong đoạn đầu tiên, tác giả nói rằng thị trấn đang "nín thở" vì một nhà máy chế biến chính có thể sẽ đóng cửa.
5. Government offer
- Meaning: Đề nghị của chính phủ.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: According to the writer, cane growers who refuse the government offer are expected to sell their land at a low price.
- Vietnamese: Theo tác giả, những người trồng mía từ chối đề nghị của chính phủ được kỳ vọng sẽ bán đất của họ với giá thấp.
6. Alternative business
- Meaning: Kinh doanh thay thế.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Fuel production is regarded as the most desirable alternative business for the sugar mill.
- Vietnamese: Sản xuất nhiên liệu được coi là ngành kinh doanh thay thế hấp dẫn nhất cho nhà máy đường.
7. Pesticides
- Meaning: Thuốc trừ sâu.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Tom Watters reduced his use of pesticides.
- Vietnamese: Tom Watters đã giảm sử dụng thuốc trừ sâu.
8. Profitable
- Meaning: Có lợi nhuận.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Environmentally friendly farming practices have been profitable for Tom Watters.
- Vietnamese: Các hoạt động canh tác thân thiện với môi trường đã mang lại lợi nhuận cho Tom Watters.
9. Expand
- Meaning: Mở rộng.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Cane growers who refuse the government offer are expected to expand their farms.
- Vietnamese: Những người trồng mía từ chối đề nghị của chính phủ được kỳ vọng sẽ mở rộng trang trại của họ.
10. Upkeep
- Meaning: Chi phí bảo trì hoặc duy trì.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Which of the following did Bill Phillips-Turner find most difficult to do? Reduce spending on upkeep.
- Vietnamese: Điều gì sau đây là khó khăn nhất đối với Bill Phillips-Turner? Giảm chi phí bảo trì.
11. Profitable farming practices
- Meaning: Các phương pháp canh tác có lợi nhuận.
- IELTS TUTOR xét ví dụ từ bài đọc: Environmentally friendly farming practices have been profitable for Tom Watters.
- Vietnamese: Các phương pháp canh tác thân thiện với môi trường đã có lợi nhuận đối với Tom Watters.
V. Đáp án Sweet Trouble: Đề thi thật IELTS READING (IELTS Reading Recent Actual Test)
- B
- F
- C
- A
- D
- A
- D
- B
- T
- NG
- F
- NG
- F
Các khóa học IELTS online 1 kèm 1 - 100% cam kết đạt target 6.0 - 7.0 - 8.0 - Đảm bảo đầu ra - Thi không đạt, học lại FREE
>> Thành tích học sinh IELTS TUTOR với hàng ngàn feedback được cập nhật hàng ngày